<p></p>
<div>
<p>A High <a target="_blank" href="http://gistreel.com/tag/Court"><strong>Court</strong></a> in Ikeja has dismissed a defamation suit brought against popular Instagram activist Martins Otse, better known as <strong>Verydarkman</strong> (VDM), by renowned human rights lawyer <strong>Femi Falana</strong> (SAN) and his son, rapper and actor <strong>Falz</strong>.</p>
<p>The legal action was linked to a viral audio recording allegedly made by cross-dresser Idris Okunneye, widely known as Bobrisky.</p>
<figure id="attachment_1171124" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1171124" style="width: 739px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-1171124" alt="Court dismisses Falana and Falz's â¦500m defamation suit against Verydarkman" width="739" height="415" data-lazy- src="https://toptechblitz.com.ng/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/images-2025-04-16T073757.048.jpeg"/><img decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-1171124" src="https://toptechblitz.com.ng/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/images-2025-04-16T073757.048.jpeg" alt="Court dismisses Falana and Falz's â¦500m defamation suit against Verydarkman" width="739" height="415" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-1171124" class="wp-caption-text">Court dismisses Falana and Falz’s defamation suit against Verydarkman.</figcaption></figure>
<p>The recording reportedly accused Falana and his son of attempting to obstruct justice.</p>
<p>Following this, VDM posted a video discussing the audio on his social media pages, prompting the Falanas to seek N500 million each as compensation for defamation.</p>
<p>When the case was called on Tuesday, none of the parties involved — including Falana, Falz, and VDM — were present in court.</p>
<p>During the session, VDM’s lawyer, Niyi Alagbe, who represented lead counsel Marvin Omorogbe, informed the court that an application had already been filed before Justice Fimisola Azeez, asking for a stay of proceedings in the matter.</p>
<p>Responding to this, the Falanas’ lawyer, Omotayo Olatunbosun, said he received the new application late Monday afternoon.</p>
<p>He insisted that the court should continue with the preliminary objection hearing, which had already been scheduled for the day. He claimed the new application was merely a tactic to delay the case.</p>
<p>Justice Matthias Dawodu, however, stated that the application referred to by the defence was not in the court’s file.</p>
<p>He also questioned why he was handling the matter when the main case was already before another judge.</p>
<p>The judge then decided to strike out the case, noting that it would be pointless to proceed with the hearing when the core suit was already under the jurisdiction of a different court.</p>
<p>“<em>This matter is hereby struck out,”</em> Justice Dawodu ruled.</p>
</p></div>
<p><a href="https://www.gistreel.com/court-dismisses-falana-and-falzs-%E2%82%A6500m-defamation-suit-against-verydarkman/" previewlistener="true">Source link </a></p>

